Review: OL-CsPBr3

The paper reports a study on plasmon-assisted PL enhancement in CsPBr3 nanocrystals. Efforts were paid to the clarification of underlying

Physical mechanisms by using time-resolved PL measurements and femtosecond laser pump-probe methods. While the big picture seems

to be correct, more details and discussion are needed , these include:

 

  1. In CsPbBrs, both exciton and bi-exciton could be excited, however, in current paper only exciton has been considered. Can the authors please add literature and discuss about it, for example, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03098 
  2. Time evolution of PL over a longer time period is not shown and discussed. For example, what will happen for a measurement lasting for 400 seconds, has the authors done such measurement, how stable is the PL and did you see any blink? Please elaborate or discuss about it.
  3. In paragraph beneath Fig.3, it says ’To further quantiverly describe the PL dynamics, a bi-exponentioal function…..was exploited to fit…’, here, I wish to see in supplementary how such fitting was done, what is the A1 and A2 values.From there, can authors discuss about which mechanism is dominant, radiative or non-radiative, what is rough weighting between them?
  4. In Fig. 2(a), can you please mark the exciton-absorption peak position as mentioned in text?
  5. Typo: paragraph beneath Fig. 2, ‘Therefore, steady-stale PL’, should be steady-state

 

 

Mae croeso i chi gysylltu gyda’r Brifysgol yn Gymraeg neu Saesneg

You are welcome to contact the University in Welsh or English

Rhif Elusen Gofrestredig 1141565 – Registered Charity No. 1141565

Gall y neges e-bost hon, ac unrhyw atodiadau a anfonwyd gyda hi, gynnwys deunydd cyfrinachol ac wedi eu bwriadu i’w defnyddio’n unig gan y sawl y cawsant eu cyfeirio ato (atynt). Os ydych wedi derbyn y neges e-bost hon trwy gamgymeriad, rhowch wybod i’r anfonwr ar unwaith a dilewch y neges. Os na fwriadwyd anfon y neges atoch chi, rhaid i chi beidio a defnyddio, cadw neu ddatgelu unrhyw wybodaeth a gynhwysir ynddi. Mae unrhyw farn neu safbwynt yn eiddo i’r sawl a’i hanfonodd yn unig ac nid yw o anghenraid yn cynrychioli barn Prifysgol Bangor. Nid yw Prifysgol Bangor yn gwarantu bod y neges e-bost hon neu unrhyw atodiadau yn rhydd rhag firysau neu 100% yn ddiogel. Oni bai fod hyn wedi ei ddatgan yn uniongyrchol yn nhestun yr e-bost, nid bwriad y neges e-bost hon yw ffurfio contract rhwymol – mae rhestr o lofnodwyr awdurdodedig ar gael o Swyddfa Cyllid Prifysgol Bangor.

This email and any attachments may contain confidential material and is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you must not use, retain or disclose any information contained in this email. Any views or opinions are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Bangor University. Bangor University does not guarantee that this email or any attachments are free from viruses or 100% secure. Unless expressly stated in the body of the text of the email, this email is not intended to form a binding contract – a list of authorised signatories is available from the Bangor University Finance Office.

Leave a Reply