{"id":1815,"date":"2022-05-20T09:14:07","date_gmt":"2022-05-20T08:14:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/laserphotonics.uk\/?p=1815"},"modified":"2022-05-20T09:14:08","modified_gmt":"2022-05-20T08:14:08","slug":"comparison-between-different-inscription-methods-of-fbg-in-cytop-polymer-optical-fiber","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laserphotonics.uk\/?p=1815","title":{"rendered":"Comparison between different inscription methods of FBG in CYTOP polymer optical fiber"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Comparison between different inscription methods of FBG in CYTOP polymer optical fiber<\/span><\/div>\n
Karima Chah<\/a>,\u00a0Ying-Gang Nan<\/a>,\u00a0Ivan Chapalo<\/a>,\u00a0Patrice M\u00e9gret<\/span>,\u00a0Christophe Caucheteur<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
Author Affiliations +<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
\n
Proceedings Volume 12139, Optical Sensing and Detection VII;<\/a>\u00a01213910 (2022)\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1117\/12.2621468<\/a>
Event:\u00a0SPIE Photonics Europe<\/a>, 2022, Strasbourg, France<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n